this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
129 points (97.8% liked)

Linux

48209 readers
1612 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some mix of wrong and right, the exact proportions of which I'll leave as an exercise to the reader.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As an inexperienced user, I can tell you that Debian is way harder to use than most people think. Out of the box, the distro is pretty bare ones. I'm having a blast using an Arch based distro, but on Debian I had to do everything manually. Stable is freaking old and unstable has lots of limitations, Docker for example is a true pain.

Ubuntu, Mint, Zorin, POP OS, are way better than Debian for users like me.

[–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 13 points 1 year ago

Stable is freaking old

Red hat users would feel right at home, right?

[–] stanford@discuss.as200950.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reading this, I wonder if we talk about the same Debian 😆

[–] pwnna@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I hate configuring Linux distros which is why I use arch btw"

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Arch based, not the same thing. Crystal Linux bundles everything out of the box, so noobs like me don't have to do anything.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Stable is freaking old and unstable.

I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of people (incorrectly) equate "stable" with "bug-free". So conversely, having bugs would be "unstable".

[–] gilbert31@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think he meant: Stable is freaking old. Unstable has a lot of limitations.

[–] SirAramis@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure the whole statement is

Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations

I don't think they're saying Debian LTS is unstable.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.

[–] tappyturtle@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m having a blast using an Arch based distro, but on Debian I had to do everything manually

how???

RHEL costs $600 a year. Its users can cope with debian easily.