this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
1129 points (89.4% liked)

Memes

45655 readers
2492 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How is China imperialist? The other stuff you're saying us wrong too, but i know the propaganda you will point to to get there. But imperialist? You mean Belt and Road? Building hospitals in Africa?

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You mean the theocratic slaver state of Tibet that was liberated by the PLA? That's a fine place to start to show that you are just another western left anti-communist.

Edit: I'd recommend Blackshirts and Reds to understand the phenomenon of left anti-communism in the West. If you're serious about communism, it might help you understand the rift driven between you and the people you call "tankies" https://mltheory.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/michael-parenti-blackshirts-and-reds_-rational-fascism-and-the-overthrow-of-communism-2001.pdf

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I will check out the book. I've been wrong about plenty of things before, so always willing to learn

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. It was one i found very clarifying when i was trying to learn more about AES and sort through the reality of those countries as opposed to the Western version of them

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Download it to my phone. Will read on the bus tomorrow

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes yes yes, China freed and liberated Tibet by taking it over. Of course. Nothing imperialist about that.

Just like the US has been liberating and freeing all those people in the middle east.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a big a difference between the two actions. Let's start with the US. They "liberate" Iraq and Afghanistan and proceed to extract value out of the country. Byzantine networks of private contractor orgs: Haliburton, KBR, Blackwater all making money, along with the military industrial profiteer complex. These countriee were hollowed out for profit and foreign extraction. US empire nakedly acts to make money for the ruling class.

Now, where is that in Tibet? Where is the capitalist extraction? Where is the hollowing out and using up of resources? People in Tibet are now freer, and better educated, and live better lives now than when they were slaves to the lamas. Its not cynical double speak to call what happened in Tibet liberation the way the US government claimed to he liberating Iraq. They freed an enslaved people, that's not an act of imperialism just because it involved an army. An army literally named the People's Liberation Army

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You think that China does not extract any economic value out of Tibet? That's pure naivete.

The victorious imperialists ALWAYS claim that their subjugation of another is to the benefit of that other nations. Always.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't know how to actually counter what i said because you don't really know about Tibet or the PRC, or understand that while its not yet operating under full socialism, it does have a dictatorship of the proletariat guided by a revolutionary vanguard party. Not understanding these things, yet having an opinion about the PRC is charitably naivete

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol did you copy and paste the definition of Leninism from wikipedia?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No I'm an ML so i don't need to check a wiki, its just straight off the dome. Is it weird that a ML party governs a nation using ML concepts?

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just think it's funny that you're trying to flex your oh so superior knowledge about what's literally 101 level communism.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not trying to flex. That's just the situation in the PRC that you don't seem to respect, since you view China as imperialist based on nothing

[–] LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Walks like a duck, talks like a duck, swims like a duck, annexes other countries like a duck. But it insists it’s a platypus so I guess we’ll pretend it’s a mammal.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

They literally freed slaves in Tibet. How is that imperialism? Was John Brown an imperialist at Harper's Ferry?

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Warning: Hexbear emoji

spoilerjohn-brown

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

His soul is marching on!

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, and it actively tries to censor and erase the fact that it ran down its own citizens with tanks.

Are you saying that China doesn't censor or try to hide this? Can I just go to Tienanmen square and start talking to locals about what happened there and they'll openly talk about how awful it was?

[–] McCainRBGcreampie@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you think happened at Tienanmen Square? Because you might want to figure that out before you start grinning like a moron while asking a Chinese person about "how awful what happened at Tienanmen Square was".

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you're trying to get at here. Are you suggesting there was no massacre?

[–] McCainRBGcreampie@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not at Tienanmen Square. Confirmed by western reporters at the scene along with contemporary US diplomatic cables later leaked by Wikileaks. Western media is really attached to that image of the guy in front of a tank, so everyone just pretends it was the site of a mass murder. Really odd.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] McCainRBGcreampie@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is. The only evidence of a massacre of protestors in Tienanmen Square presented in that article is Wu'erkaixi's claim that he saw 200 people shot, but he had actually left the protests hours before the final protestors left, and literally everyone else present (including western journalists) says that the last protestors left peacefully.

Edit: Here's an overview from the former Beijing bureau chief of The Washington Post, who was in Beijing covering the protests in 1989.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] McCainRBGcreampie@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

You could read the article.

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

Still waiting to hear where you got that "people run down by tanks" thing.

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While we're on the subject of propaganda: what was it that made you believe China "ran down its own citizens with tanks"? What is the actual source of this belief.

[–] McCainRBGcreampie@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I saw a picture of a man in front of a tank, and we all know how evil chinese people are, so it's not hard to figure out what happened."

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

That's my assumption, yes.