this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
42 points (85.0% liked)

Games

32589 readers
1397 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] teamchuckles@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The reason players prefer Steam is because the other products are not good. If a launcher wants to compete with Steam, they need to do things that Steam does better than Steam or do things that Steam cannot do yet. Right now, I log into Steam and I am immediately in my library without any ads or recommendations, ready to launch because Steam lets me pick where I load in. When I log into Epic, I am stuck in the store page with a full app rotating banner of a bunch of games I am not interested in. Plus the library is limited in scope and I have to slowly navigate through all the games to find the game I want to play. Same with Blizzard, Ubi, all of them.

I don't know if you intended it this way, but saying that Steam users are hostile of other launchers makes us sound like we are unreasonable in what we are asking for. If Epic was better than Steam, I would use it. It's not.

[โ€“] Carighan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More importantly, as a consumer you really ought to not be bothered whether CEO #1 gets 100% of the money or has to split 30% with CEO #2. Either way, some rich old farts are getting richer and fartier.

Yeah, sure, indie games and all. That's nice. But it's all the company side, and as a consumer we ought to look at consumer values, in which Steam is just strictly superior. It has features that are actually useful, a far far far far larger library, and most of us have a significant portion of our library there already.

Plus, hey: It doesn't log you out every 2-3 days for not reason. ๐Ÿ˜‘

[โ€“] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's all just Epic talking points. "Lower cut means more money for developers! Lower cut means lower prices!" It's never been proven to be true. Shit in some cases I'd much rather my money go to Valve than the developers anyway. Much rather fund Linux/Vulkan/VR development than whatever bullshit Rockstar, EA or Activision are up to.

[โ€“] cottonmon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of these people who love defending Epic also treat them as if they didn't do anything to earn their reputation for being shitty back then.

[โ€“] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And they pretend Epic is the only competition to Steam. Nobody is taking shit about GOG because GOG doesn't have shitty business practices.

[โ€“] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

GoG did start adding shitty ads when you claim games from Amazon, maybe on purchase too I haven't bought anything in a while.

[โ€“] amenotef@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And steam works like a charm in Linux with windows games.

Also works fine with joysticks like dualsense. (Although for some reason they started overriding the native driver with their own steam API after launching steam games even if the game is set to disable steam input).

Going more on topic. I still go for the lower price (and I tend to buy games from 1-3 years ago which are cheaper). But if the price difference is small, I go with steam.