this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
1530 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1167 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely shouldn't he not be afraid of his employees unionizing if he treats them well?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hell if he treats them well and compensates them fairly a union might prove beneficial to him

[–] Rilichu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If a "good boss" is being an actual good boss, the worst they should have to expect from the union is having the occasional friendly meeting with them to discuss any minor workplace concerns and contract negotiations.

The fact many "good bosses" immediately start sprewing hell and brimstone at the mention of a union hints maybe they ain't as good and benevolent as they claim to be.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

I completely agree. A good boss would likely appreciate a union, because the kinds of minor concerns that might be raised at a meeting are the kinds of things that individuals wouldn't mention because it's not worth the stress to flag it - even under a good boss who you trust would take even minor concerns seriously, it still costs time and brain energy to raise a thing, and the union being the middle man between the boss and the worker can be a boon in terms of collating concerns.

Not least of all because one of the concerns may be about a thing that is genuinely too trivial to make a thing of, if it's only affecting one person. A union has the ability to go "hey, so this is only a small thing but a few people have mentioned it to us and we went around asking and it does seem quite widespread"