this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
1305 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

45655 readers
2320 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

spoilerFor people that don't know this is not how you use Calipers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Noughmad@programming.dev 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's a great test for programmers called FizzBuzz. It's an extremely easy task - print some numbers (maybe 1 to 100), but replace them with Fizz if they're divisible by 3, by Buzz if they're divisible by 5, or by FizzBuzz if they're both.

Many reasonable people consider it way too easy - if you can write this, it doesn't mean that you can write complex programs, or that you know the applicable languages, or that you know anything about the business domain.

But interviewers know that it's a great test because a lot of so-called programmers still fail it.

[–] foo@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We did a fizzbuzz interview with a candidate. He passed but I had a weird feeling about it so we asked him to do another one with 7 and 21 and he couldn't do it even with his old code right there

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

Damn, dude managed to literally memorize code without having any idea of what was going on. Meanwhile, I'd spend most of my time trying to figure whether it's div or mod that i'm supposed to use to check for the remainder of a division, I always forget which is which

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's slightly different because all numbers divisible by 21 are also divisible by 7, so you would get all Fizz and FizzBuzz but no Buzz. So the question is, should you even be checking for Buzz, or should you make your code more efficient by eliminating those lines?

[–] Noughmad@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I think they meant 3/7/21 instead of the standard 3/5/15.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh I could see how that would trap someone. It would trap me but I'm not a programmer. 😆

[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

I very much prefer every product of multiplication of 9 up to 3000 in a descending order.

Ypu get to see a lot more than the fizzbuzz. And still very easy task. Then you can ask about processing and memory optimizations.