this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
522 points (98.5% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And those of us that weren't duped (and did actually vote) are stuck along for the ride, all the while knowing how preventable this whole mess was.

For starters, some of the people voting to leave didn't even know what the EU was, some voted simply because they wanted to spite David Cameron, and some thought it'd get rid of the "foreigners". All absolutely dumbfuck reasons to fuck over the country by voting leave.

Furthermore, a bunch of the remainers didn't even vote because they assumed we'd win, which is also a massively dumbfuck reason not to vote, as by doing so they effectively voted to leave instead.

To be slightly fair to them though, I'd too have a hard time imagining that there'd be so many people willing to vote so completely against their own interests based off almost solely off the words of two slimy rich bastards and a bus.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Should watch us here in the US. We always vote against our interests and it always turns to shite.

Not voting or voting without knowing what's being voted for are yet another thing we're #1 at.

[–] GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I found astonishing is that it only required a 50%+1 vote majority for something that important.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It only required that because it was a "non-binding, advisory" referendum.

I mean it was fairly obvious leading up to the vote that it wasn't just going to be taken as advisory, but there technically should have been another vote before Brexit formally happened.

Of course that wouldn't happen though, because the conservatives that wanted Brexit to happen knew they got lucky first time round, and would lose their lightning in a bottle of they'd put it out there a second time.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It doesn't. It was a non binding vote. A binding vote required 2/3rds.