this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
437 points (76.4% liked)

Android

27947 readers
173 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(unpaywalled version on archive.today: https://archive.ph/03cwZ)

Interesting figure that comes out of the article: 87% of US teens prefer iPhones. Also the explanations given aren't quite surprising, I guess it's mostly because of iMessage. Teens will feel like outcasts if they get an Android phone while their friends still use iMessage because of the green bubbles.

It's actually hilarious how we allowed consumerism to take us this far and that we have now peer pressure over smartphones.

“You’re telling me in 2023, you still have a ’Droid? [...] You gotta be at least 50 years old.”

ouch 😔

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] favrion@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those teenagers are the victim of a failing educational system because they're clearly idiots.

[–] roanescence@mstdn.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

@favrion @AlmightySnoo it's scary how unstable, impulsive, crazy, persuasive they are. I see many jobs getting destroyed after our generation. I can literally not think of how a genz is gonna be like a data analyst. I would like to see many outliers tho.

[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's funny. We said the same about you... Every gen shits on the next one. Every next gen figures it out.

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A lot of millennials are struggling though. Only a few figured it out. It could be even worse for GenZ.

As a professor, I am terrified of what will happen when GenZ takes the reins. Without changing course content, GenZ has been failing what millennials passed without issue.

[–] ExtraMedicated@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Millenials are struggling because the previous generations fucked everything up, not because they can't figure things out.

[–] roanescence@mstdn.social 1 points 1 year ago

@ExtraMedicated @canihasaccount we can't blame them fully. Who would've thought carl segan would be right when he used to say that temperature will rise or When some used to say capitalism needs a check and balance.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is just old people perspective. Every generation has been smarter than the previous since at least WWII. Every generation also seems pretty dumb at 19 years old.

Our schools have improved by leaps and bounds and get better all the time.

[–] Coffeemonkepants@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Our? Where? In the US? Certainly not in the US. By any measure. Math scores are the lowest they've been in decades, same with science. Nevermind all of the fascist 1984 book banning and burning nonsense happening in certain places. These kids are not smarter.

https://www.the74million.org/article/americas-education-system-is-a-mess-and-its-students-who-are-paying-the-price/

Passing/failing the same educational curriculum is about as close as you can get to objectively measuring "smart", and a professor just told you they are seeing gen z fail. Not sure why that's so easy to scoff at.

[–] CSharp@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Curious in which ways specifically you think that millennials are struggling.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably financially, this of course isn't something the millennials caused or can even correct on their own.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The good news is GenZ seems to direct their stupidity towards good things, mostly. They're not racist or sexist or greedy etc. They try to help and improve the world. They effect change through sheer firepower.

The bad news is that stupid people are easily manipulated, and as soon as the boomers die off, zoomers will be the next target.

[–] roanescence@mstdn.social 1 points 1 year ago

@jhulten yeah I'm not completely against how they are and i understand that them being like this might be helpful too in the future tech and/or advancement of human civilization. While i still think it's quite sloppy right now. And yeah we might've been more disastrous then the last gen.
As much as i agree that if i were in last gen, I wouldn't want to miss and not see how much development we've seen in my time, I actually fancy your gen and society of that time. It's just FOMO, innit?

[–] waz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are still smart kids out there. They are probably not wrapped up in this Android/iPhone war.

Be careful not to group people together based on one criteria and judge them based on another.

[–] roanescence@mstdn.social 2 points 1 year ago

@waz no it was just a critical comment and i didn't even see the initial comment so ofcourse i was generalising.

https://mstdn.social/@roanescence/110919390727155840