this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
191 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
15 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Solar and wind can't replace nuclear energy. You can't get 24/7 output from renewable sources, and you can't store extra energy when you produce it (and you can't just beam energy thousands of kilometers when there's overproduction somewhere but underproduction somewhere else), so you need a source with a stable output alongside sources that sometimes don't produce anything.

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right now Sweden has adequate baseload, they are well positioned to go with more renewable.

UHVDC and HVDC links can be used to transmit power over thousands of kms. I think the longest line currently is in China a 1100kVDC line that stretches over 3300kms.

Even with conventional AC transmission, power generated in Churchill Falls and James Bay eventually ends up in population centres in Southern Canada and New England.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, interesting, I was under the impression that losses at distances like that would make it impractical

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Losses are a lot lower with DC transmission, but it has been traditionally more expensive. Costs are coming down now as more research and better power electronics are becoming available.

[–] LordR@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can store electricity pretty well either with Pumped-storage hydroelectric plants or with batteries (that recently got way cheaper and more efficient. If you start adding batteries to buildings with solar panels, the buildings can provide electricity for themselves for longer periods of times which will lower energy costs for households.

If you build more Nuclear Power Plants, it is big corporations that profit and not the regular people. I prefer to help regular people.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Far as I know current battery technology just isn't up to it because it relies on rare earth materials that are extracted with processes that are absolutely terrible for the environment and are, well, rare.

[–] LordR@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true for batteries that have to be lightweight. There are salt water batteries that do not require any (or a lot) rare earth materials. They are about twice as heavy if I remember correctly, but for a house that doesn't matter a lot. And the good thing is that the more batteries are used in houses, the better and more efficient they get.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Salt batteries?! Huh, that's neat, I learnded a thing today thanks to you.

Dug up some info on them. Apparently their problem is that they don't have high discharge or charge currents and they need some energy to keep their temperature, but in cases where those are OK they definitely seem promising.

[–] LordR@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I just figured out that they are called "Aqueous Hybrid Ion Battery" in English, so they are not the molten ones.

I didn't find a lot about them, but this website seems to have an overview about them (although they are the main manufacturer of the batteries, so they are probably biased): https://www.aquionenergy.com/technology/aqueous-hybrid-ion-ahi/#What_Are_Saltwater_Batteries_and_How_Are_They_Different

[–] LordR@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I just figured out that they are called "Aqueous Hybrid Ion Battery" in English, so they are not the molten ones.

I didn't find a lot about them, but this website seems to have an overview about them (although they are the main manufacturer of the batteries, so they are probably biased): https://www.aquionenergy.com/technology/aqueous-hybrid-ion-ahi/#What_Are_Saltwater_Batteries_and_How_Are_They_Different