this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
260 points (89.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43885 readers
1905 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's actually the root of all social philosophies: they require decent people.

No matter which system you take, capitalism, communism, anarchism, monarchy, democracy, etc. they all would work perfectly fine, if people wouldn't be stupid, selfish and about 1% downright psychopaths. And I'm not even talking about real crimes. In your example it would be perfectly legal, to pay the workers the absolute minimum possible, but it would be a dick move.

At the end of the day, a system always has to answer the question: How do you reign in assholes? That's it. Designing a system based on Jesuses is trivial.

[โ€“] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not enough to reign in assholes, the system has to be designed in such a way that carriers of "dark triad" traits (i.e. the usual bad faith actors in a system) are still incentivized to contribute to or improve society without gradually dismantling it to increase their wealth/power/status. That's a hard problem to solve.

That's pretty much what I meant, or at least an aspect of it.

"Asshole" is an umbrella term for me that means every anti-social behavior or more general, behavior against the spirit (not the text!) of whatever ideology you're implementing.

Whether your system fails because one "dark" person can manipulate 100s to do bad things for him or 100s of persons do small bad things every day doesn't really matter at the end - the system failed.

So you have to find a way to reign this behavior in. Psychopaths react similar to every other person, just way more extreme.

[โ€“] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[โ€“] DubiousInterests@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think capitalism is the outlier there. Some atleast expect knobheads but the free hand of the market or something is supposed to take them out of business.

[โ€“] abclop99@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

But it doesn't seem to expect "knobheads" manipulating the hand.

[โ€“] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In your example it would be perfectly legal, to pay the workers the absolute minimum possible, but it would be a dick move.

How does that differ from the current way things are done? (especially in the US)

Largely it doesn't. There are some boundaries, like minimum wages and maximum working hours, etc. But according to the hypercapitalists, even those minimums are already undue influence by the government.