this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
228 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10181 readers
81 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] borkcorkedforks@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is that I can already spin up extra LLCs and get extra ballots?

[–] Blakerboy777@feddit.online 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The corporations themselves cannot vote. This law allows the owner of the corporation to vote even if they do not live within the city proper. No one can vote twice - whether you live in the city and own a corporation or own multiple corporations. And it's only for corporations that own property. While it's easy to imagine this backfiring, the steelman position is - you own a small business one town over, you have a significant role in the local economy, giving you one vote the same as any resident sounds pretty reasonable. Rich folk who own a house and live their 2 months out of the year are potentially eligible to vote as well, so it's potentially more justified that the owner of the local bakery gets to vote too. Could this end up being horribly abused? I don't know that there are enough safeguards against it. But this doesn't immediately scream the end of democracy to me.

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

But it definitely screams the death of a town when corporate find a way to game the system.

[–] AveragePigeon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I guess my main concern would be, are these owners or part-time residents voting elsewhere also? Would give new meaning to "vote early, vote often" if so.