this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
572 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

32013 readers
1017 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most servers are not able to access the Google API.

Invidious report of the same(ish) problem: https://github.com/iv-org/invidious/issues/4045#issuecomment-1674373088

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can always grab a browser extension. Apple has Vinegar, not sure what others run. Just plucks the video feed direct pretty much like Piped. So no ads. Still stuck on YT unfortunately

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would it be possible for many, many people to use yt downloaders to fetch certain categories of yt videos (Linux tutorials for example) and serve them in a decentralized media network like the fediverse? Basically a distributed, downloaded "migration" of yt content, with no central source or authority that the pipe apps can retrieve from instead of YouTube. Yet again, I've basically just reinvented bittorrent but for YouTube content, so maybe it's not that practical...

That totally sounds possible to me! The other person responding seems to not have very good reading comprehension. Yeah, the only thing stopping this would be drm but apparently most yt videos don't have drm, since if they did, those downloader apps couldn't work.

It's not a half bad idea honestly.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No. They all have to connect via an API that ultimately Google controls and monitors. Unfortunately decentralized or not, they all tap into the same well.

But in any case, the extensions can’t be spotted by YT, so that’s why they have the best chance of co existing (or not easily).

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't sound like you understood the question

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understood fine. How are you getting these videos to begin with? You think Google won’t notice? And when you have them, where are you storing them?

And paying for it all, how?

Trust me. I understood just fine.

You dismissed the idea as if it weren't possible without engaging with it. It would be possible. I'm not developing the app so I don't feel the need to provide a detailed plan but these all are solvable problems. The biggest issue keeping it from being a reality would be the legal one.

[–] pijon@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Not sure it would be legal. I guess the authors of the videos should upload them themselves.