anything on 'the use of any tactical nuclear weapon' or 'the destruction of a nuclear facility', what with that being what the conversation is about and all

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

..., dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory...

This you left out on purpose?

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an "immediate response", and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions

thats why it says "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"

as opposed to "or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory"

so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says

[–] TomHardy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t