this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
-10 points (38.1% liked)

Fediverse

17724 readers
95 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
-10
Looking for a free speech instance (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by rist097@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am looking to change my instance since many defederation and censorship decisions on lemmy.world.

Anyone knows of any instance that has a rule against defederation and is more free speech oriented. Of course I am looking for an instance that forbids illegal content like CP. But I want an instance that does not censor hate speech!

The instance should be hopefully federated with mostly everyone, unless defederated because of CP. I was considering lemm.ee, but I saw a comment from an admin saying that they could consider defederation if certain propaganda reaches front page.

Before anyone accuses me of anything, I just want to be exposed to different viewpoints, and I am not offended so easily, so I can tolerate offensive content. What is important is that the rules on defederation dont change in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rist097@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well you are contradicting.

People who are affected by the hate speech, can easily chose one of the many instances that are curating and censoring, and that is completely fine. The others who are not sensitive to it and want to hear what the other side is saying, should have a way to do so I think.

And basically all hate-speech is same idea. It is a rephrasing of one, single thought: “Those others, who are different to us, are inferior, and a threat to our way of life.”

Well you know, the same is said by both sides, and on both sides people always find a way to justify their stance and portray the other side as the worst evil, while the reality is in between.

That's why I am not picking sides, but instead decide on my own what I think make sense what does not, but in order to be able to do that, one needs to be exposed to both sides of the argument. You don't need to agree on everything with particular group, but you can agree on some things

[–] darq@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

People who are affected by the hate speech, can easily chose one of the many instances that are curating and censoring

And they do. And thus you will not see them, if you are in a space that does not remove hate-speech. You can join multiple spaces if you want, that's fine. But if you are choosing a single space, then you can choose one or the other. The voices of many diverse groups of people, or that one single repetition of fear of the other.

Well you know, the same is said by both sides, and on both sides people always find a way to justify their stance and portray the other side as the worst evil, while the reality is in between.

Please try actually reading, and thinking about what is written, rather than just typing out the first thought-terminating cliche that comes to mind. It's really difficult to take such nonsense seriously.