this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
75 points (93.1% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

First of all, let's try to avoid American-bashing, and stay respectful to everyone.

I'll start: for me it's the tipping culture. Especially nowadays, with the recent post on !mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world with the 40% tip, it just seems so weird to me to have to pay extra just so that menu prices can stay low.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] silvercove@lemdro.id 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The massive dependence on cars. I don't understand why people put up with this nonsense. I just walk everywhere.

[โ€“] Flip@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

I read a travel guide to another European city I was visiting, and the guide was aimed at Americans. It's a major really walkable city, with car access as good as nonexistent (wonderful). It surprised me, that some Americans walk so little, that the first advice in the guide was "start by trying to walk around your house"

[โ€“] Ejh3k@midwest.social -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have you seen the size of America?

[โ€“] bouh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have large cities separated by vast empty lands. A good train network would be much faster and much more efficient.

In cities it's even worse. Cars are the least efficient way to organise a city or travel in it.

The only thing you optimize with cars is individualism.

[โ€“] KarmaTrainCaboose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This doesn't take into account the amount of suburbia in the US though. European cities are way more dense. If you're in a neighborhood out in the suburbs the only option is really to drive.

[โ€“] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not with proper public transports. Suburbs are also far better with public transports than cars.

[โ€“] Gawanoh@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Even in small cities you are kinda dependent on a car but you are able to drive to the closest train station and use the train to get to the next bigger city. In North Carolina (USA) I made the experience that the train is often not an option to get to the next bigger city or so expensive it is not worth it on a travel budget.

I enjoyed the speed limit on your highway's.

[โ€“] ebikefolder@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Europe is bigger than the US, but how often do you travel all across? The radius of movement might be a bit bigger in the US, due to bad design (urban sprawl). That's a choice. You can plan cities better if you want to.

I don't go from Sicily to Finland every week (but if i wanted to, I could easily do so by train). The size doesn't matter in my daily life.