this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
498 points (93.7% liked)

Today I Learned

17819 readers
459 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two of us, Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky, testified for Assange at his extradition hearing last year. In Ellsberg's words then, the WikiLeaks publications that Assange is being charged for are "amongst the most important truthful revelations of hidden criminal state behavior that have been made public in U.S. history." The American public "needed urgently to know what was being done routinely in their name, and there was no other way for them to learn it than by unauthorized disclosure."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gowan@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"On 11 April 2019, the day of Assange's arrest in London, the indictment against him was unsealed.[60] He was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion (i.e. hacking into a government computer), a crime that carries a maximum 5-year sentence.[61][62]

The charges allege that Assange sought to help Chelsea Manning crack a password hash so that Manning could use a different username to download classified documents. This "would have made it more difficult for investigators to identify Manning as the source of disclosures of classified information".[63][64][65][66] This allegation had been known since 2011 and is a less serious charge than those levelled against Manning, and carries a maximum sentence of five years.[67][68] The US pointed to chat logs and filed an affidavit that said they were able to identify Assange as the person chatting with Manning using hints he made during the chats and that Manning identified him as Assange to Adrian Lamo.[64][69]"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment_and_arrest_of_Julian_Assange#:~:text=He%20was%20charged%20with%20conspiracy,a%20maximum%205%2Dyear%20sentence.

No Im right on the money here

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did they charge Al Capone with?

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Tax evasion as they could prove that. There is evidence that Assange was directly involved in the hacks. He is being charged with that.

[–] flint5436@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That the US law forbids such acts is a no brainer. But it's still "Telling the truth". imho this qualifies him for the nobel peace price rather than incarceration.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it isn't telling the truth. He isn't being pursued for sharing the info but rather in directly committing crimes to get the info. The NYT could publish the Pentagon Papers because they did not steal them.

Assange is accused of being involved in the theft. He's also now a Russian stooge so probably deserves nothing other than what the US prison system will give him.

[–] flint5436@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He isn't being pursued for sharing the info but rather in directly committing crimes to get the info.

Debatable. But even if he did, that means he helped uncover the human rights abuses of the US and it's allies and their unbelievable collateral damage(~60% of deaths in Irak where civilians). Again maybe legally wrong, but ethically it was the right thing to do.

He's also now a Russian stooge so probably

I don't know where you get that info from, but if I had messed with the largest military industrial complex on the planet, I'd be looking for friends in other contries aswell. Snowden understadably did the same.

probably deserves nothing other than what the US prison system will give him.

I wouldn't even want my worst enemy to experience US prisons. They are inhumane and they torture prisoners (extended solitary confinement) on a daily basis as a form of coercion. How could you wish this on anyone?

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

It isn't debatable as that is what he is charged with. The fact that his crimes might have produced benefits for someone is immaterial to the fact he broke the law.

Given that he is without question in the employ if the Kremlin at this point, and possibly always was, he's not someone I would hold up as being heroic or ethical.

His crimes are crimes. He isn't protected by 1A if he broke the law to get the info he shared.