this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023

1007 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers

2826 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.world

queue@beehaw.org

funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone

PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone

threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.world

remotelove@lemmy.ca

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world

qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qaz@sh.itjust.works

qaz@lemmy.sdf.org

1007

Systemic rulecism explained well (i.imgur.com)

submitted 1 year ago by unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zeshade@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What view are they trying to counter here? I understand all the words of the post and I agree with the logic but I don't see in what situation this argument is useful. Perhaps I'm lucky not to have been exposed to the people for whom it would be useful...

Edit: I saw some very clear answers to my questions after scrolling down a bit. I think I just didn't understand what the term "systemic" meant here.

[–] shapis@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

"wow you are trying to punish x people for wrongdoings of their parents/grandparents" is the argument it's trying to counter.