this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
-26 points (11.8% liked)

Conservative

286 readers
32 users here now

We are a community dedicated to discussion surrounding the political right.

People of all political views are welcome here, but we expect a high level of discussion from everyone.

Rules:
-Good Faith participation only. take hollow shit slinging elsewhere please
-Stay on topic. should be obvious
-Follow instance rules. They pay the bills, they get to set rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] admin@lemmy-mormonsatan-u23030.vm.elestio.app 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Thank you. I'm glad there is finally someone else in this conversation that has also worked with the homeless.

I don't know why people don't think I'm sympathetic to homeless people--actually I do, they are just mad because I didn't vote for Harris--but I am sympathetic. If I wasn't, I wouldn't have been able to work with them for so many years.

But it's an addiction/mental illness problem, not an income problem for most homeless.

In fact, it's very easy to look up too. So I don't even understand why people here are arguing.

Now, money committed to the overall problem is needed, but UBI to people won't actually solve the homeless situation for most of that population. Money for programs to help them, and stay with them, etc, WILL. But that's not what what UBI is, and that is the point I was making.

And here's the thing that Lemmy needs to know about this situation: Democrats have been in power plenty of times over the years. And the problem still hasn't been solved. This isn't a "Republicans caused this mess" problem. BOTH parties have fucked up on addressing this.

But I guess it's easier for computer nerds who have never had to struggle in life just to say to say that I'm lying when I say I worked with the population for years. That's easier than actually doing anything about it.

So Lemmy, step up. Dedicate your time and your money to helping the homeless. Then come back to this conversation and tell us what you learned.

Cuz I'm not taking Lemmy seriously. You guys have made $80K + a years since you were fucking 20. You all don't know shit about the homeless population or what it's like to work with them.

Not you, Peruvian Skies, I am talking about the other armchair critics in this thread.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In their defense, it is very counterintuitive. "Who would want to live on the streets?" is a perfectly valid question with an obvious answer (nobody) and a different correct answer (people with specific manifestations of mental illness).

I'm in favor of UBI and I'm in favor of specific investments to solve homelessness, which I think should be one of the most urgent topics on any political agenda worth considering. But you are right when you say that these are two completely different issues.

Agreed. I'd love for a politician from either side to approve UBI and work on the homelessness problem. So far, neither the Democrats are Republicans seem very interesting in either of those things.