this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
835 points (98.7% liked)

World News

41185 readers
4136 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump is pushing for softer language on Russia’s war in Ukraine, straining G7 unity.

Officials say the U.S. is blocking references to "Russian aggression" and prefers calling it the "Ukraine conflict."

This shift follows Trump's peace talks with Putin that excluded Ukraine's President Zelensky, whom Trump later called a "dictator."

The change in rhetoric contrasts with Biden-era support for Ukraine and threatens a unified G7 stance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the Dems are more guilty of being foolish, than of intentionally-accommodating "GEOTUS"..

Biden blocked Harris from campaigning until it was too-late, & .. whatshername .. Pelosi's threat to destroy Biden's campaign was the only thing which finally pried his hands off the opportunity..

They lived entirely-within Hopium.

They .. mostly, or nearly-all, possibly-all, .. aren't going to survive the US Civil War Part2 which will erupt when it becomes enacted that there isn't going to be any 2028 election, or sometime around then, anyways..

I don't expect much of the population of this continent to survive the next decade..

& many have worked, hard, at preventing this..

The male-supremacists & the white-supremacists who voted against Harris, THEY are guilty, certainly..

_ /\ _

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean, can’t we go back to the way that the Dems refused to see that Hillary was not popular, and how party leaders actively intervened to make sure that no one resembling an actual Dem (Bernie) got the nomination?

I think that’s really where the writing was on the wall - sabotage a popular candidate with the kind of populist support that we saw launch Trump into office, to platform someone who was probably one of the most hated women in America?