this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
508 points (97.4% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2572 readers
51 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Auction: https://www.sav.com/auctions/details/7073489/hexbear.net

Not sure what will happen, but seems to be a Fediverselore event for sure

Update: post from hexbear admin on chapo.chat: https://chapo.chat/post/4468531

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _lunar@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yes let's sexually harass all those people depending on our mutual aid comm. you're so righteous.

[–] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The idea is stupid, sure, but it's not like it's any more sexual harassment than posting pictures of a pig's ass repeatedly. Hexbear users (many of whom I quite like) should be used to it.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah harassing homeless people asking for 20 bucks so they can avoid their next hypoglycemic seizure with mid 2000's edgy shock porn explicitly for the purpose of being cruel to them IS EXACTLY THE SAME as harassing deliberate trolls acting in bad faith with a picture of an animal's butt so they go away.

You're a perfectly well adjusted person who I totally wouldn't believe hurts small animals for fun.

Swear to god Hexbear is the best thing that's ever happened to the internet if only because we get to see a lot of people's real faces when they react to it.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow a single community dedicated to giving any schmuck with a sob story some pocket change. So the whole instance must be the salt of the earth which can do no wrong and have no bad takes. Gee its almost like c/mutual_aid is a defensive shield that you think protects from legitimate criticism of the rest of hexbears extremist nonesense shitposting.

How noble, im truly moved. No, actually im not. Charity for the sake of arguing moral superiority and trying to prove a theoretical socialist system of willful wealth redistribution yet pretending its just out of goodness of hexbear users hearts is false virtue pandering.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. All I see is you trying to justify using your excess of money to deliberately hurt people because you're upset over some words said to you.

[–] Timbits@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago

Tankies run on hypocrisy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There are only two kinds of people on Lemmy.

  • People who left Reddit to escape the verbal diarrhea that overwhelmed the site.

  • People who left Reddit to spread that diarrhea.

sigh The @sh.itjust.works domain is full of the latter.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I'm just here bc people made fun of .world users, please don't make more tribalism 😭😭

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If "verbal diarrhea" is so commonplace on reddit, then it wouldn't be necessary for people to leave Reddit in order to spread it, hmm?

Obviously your entire premise is sheer stupidity regardless, but I just want point out that even according to your own internal logic, it still doesn't make any sense.

[–] UniversalMonk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Fuck tha haters. You all do great work on the instance!

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just social media posting your way to praxis? That’s a hell of a form of “mutual aid.”

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

There's a Mutual Aid comm where people in need can make a request for money or other such necessity and others can fulfil them.

[–] _lunar@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what cowbee said, and you dorks trying to get the domain to redirect hexbear to sexually explicit or otherwise useless shit are just making it that much harder for the numerous palestinians, trans people, unhoused people, etc. who have come to rely on c/mutual_aid.

good to know that owning the "tankies" is more important to you dweebs than letting us continue to help them. i really hope you're proud of yourselves.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think anyone trying to buy the domain and redirect it as some kind of joke is dumb and I don't support that.

But I'm curious how the vetting process works for c/mutual aid. How can you be sure that the money is going to people who actually need it, as opposed to people who are playing a part to garner your sympathy?

I've poked around hexbear from time to time and I remember a certain Palestinian family that was receiving fairly substantial aid. That appeared fairly legit to me, although it's still extremely difficult to be sure.

But the people who need help with rent, or help paying their phone bill, or whatever random sob story they might come up with, I view with inherent suspicion.

Have you ever considered that it might be a much more efficient use of your resources to actually walk around wherever you live and give food and blankets directly to the unhoused? To volunteer at a local soup kitchen or homeless shelter?

Sending anonymous strangers money over the internet has a very large chance of going to the wrong people who are adept at manipulating others but not actually in the most need. It has a very large chance of funding self destructive behaviors of mentally ill people that ultimately drive the individual further into poverty and misery. Just something to think about.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The mutual_aid comm literally saved me from being homeless and losing my pet cats that I've had for 10 years.

It has a very large chance of funding self destructive behaviors of mentally ill people that ultimately drive the individual further into poverty and misery.

Fuck you Nancy Grace. "Don't give that homeless man money! He'll use it on drugs"

What's the worse problem? Someone getting something 'they don't deserve' or someone not getting something they need to live?

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's great, good for you.

I think drugs are great, but they can be very harmful for people who are already mentally unstable. I deal with homeless people frequently, and in many cases, abusing drugs is a major problem for them and giving them money just perpetuates a self destructive cycle that eventually ends with them dying before their time.

Someone not getting something they need to live is the worse problem, which is why sending your charity off into the interwebs with hopes and prayers that it has a positive impact is a very naive and lazy way of doing things. You should be making sure that it helps those who are most desperate, and the only way to ensure that is to do your giving IRL.

[–] Deinonychusanti@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For your point on trust, hexbear users mostly just have to trust that the user is acting in good faith as there isn't really any way to properly verify if the person is telling the truth without forcing them to reveal personal, and potentially identifiable, information. And for your point on funding destructive behaviours, if we assume that this individual is telling the truth about their situation, then you aren't funding their drug addiction by helping them pay rent or buy food.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's fair and I respect it, we need to have the courage to trust other people and I'm sure people have received much needed aid from that community.

But at the same time we have to recognize when a system is vulnerable to abuse, and consider ways to prevent that abuse from happening, or at least limit it. Sometimes, people aren't going to tell the truth, and sometimes they may not know how to help themselves. It's very hard to recognize those scenarios when your only context is an anonymous username on an internet forum.

[–] Deinonychusanti@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In that case, you simply just have to take the risk. A well-off person giving money to another well-off person pretending to be poor isn't as harmful as a well-off person not giving money to a poor person because they think they are a well-off person pretending to be poor.

[–] Scirocco@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago

It's like giving money to the guy walking about the gas station with a story

You'll see that same guy again and again, and he never seems to put any gasoline in his can