this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
522 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
62073 readers
6755 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Opus is better in every way
Except ubiquitousness.
I can play an MP3 on any digital audio device made in the last 20 years.
True. All my devices support it, but many older ones may not.
Ubiquitousness is not an aspect of the codec, let alone a technical one. It's yet another failure of capitalism.
I use a combination of mp3s and opus primarily but I can't remember if opus is the open format ogg or not.
I don't know all the details but Ogg is dead, and Opus has all the advantages from low quality (Speex) to high quality (better than Ogg). It's made by the same guys anyway. And starting at 128 kbps approximatively, it's "near perfect" quality which means your ears won't detect the difference with FLAC. So Opus should be as small as MP3, as good as FLAC. I love that stuff.
And what's the extension of opus? .opus?
Yes.
I personally can't hear any difference with 96kbps Opus.