this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
623 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

5987 readers
3159 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 19 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I'm honestly wondering this. Renewables reduce dependency on foreign countries, so using them can be interpreted as a patriotic act. They make sense, geostrategically, not just for saving earth but also for reducing the leverage other countries have over yours. This could be something that both, green activists and nationalists, can jointly agree on. I don't get it.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Energy Dominance! is new buzz word. You are right that "energy security" best solution is to never have to pay for fuel again. Such talk is woke radical left climate alarmist talk, even though that was the word the O&G industry told us to reduce reliance on energy imports.

Energy dominance means the goal is to destroy the planet, but think of the shareholder value created by extorting the planet into US approved energy consumption. War and extortion are just more radial left woke words to distract from achieving energy dominance.

[–] vanderbilt@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

The mistake was applying logic to a position they didn’t use logic to arrive at. Their talking heads say renewables bad. The thought process ended there.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think the problem, as it often is, is big businesses lobbying for continued relevancy at the cost of societal progress.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This. Tbh most conservatives I've talked to say shit like "solar would be great if it were viable/cheaper to install," they're not against it really, they just don't think it works well enough yet, which is largely due to the efforts of lobbyists.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I firmly believe that without lobbyists pushing us into red or blue boxes, we'd all find common ground on a lot of important issues.

I've known some conservatives who are very much into solar power in a sort of independent/self-sufficient/pseudo-prepper type of way.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

I agree. I'm sure there'd still be some contentious issues but a large portion of it is entirely manufactured.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 18 hours ago

Even works down to the state level. My state, Wisconsin, has no coal mines, no oil wells, and no natural gas wells. The closest thing we have to any of it is the best sand for fracking. Otherwise, every dollar of energy we spend ends up leaving the state one way or another.

Unless, that is, we do something intelligent, like building an offshore wind farm on Lake Michigan. Though I'm sure someone will complain that we're killing the whales.