Linux

48209 readers

1612 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

zsh or fish for an intermediate Linux user? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works to c/linux@lemmy.ml

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I've been using Linux now for a while, and am looking to migrate my dev environment to vim and spend more time in the command line. I'm fairly comfortable with bash but by no means an expert. I've used zsh with some minor customization but just recently learned about fish. I'd love to hear people's opinions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cybervoid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I moved to the fish shell a while ago and I love it, everything I need works OOB. I don't understand people complaining about the different sintax for scripts, this is a non issue, just use #!/bin/bash at the start of your script and it will use bash, or just execute directly with "bash script.sh".

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand people complaining about the different sintax for scripts, this is a non issue...

I have a two major reasons:

Adding another shell syntax adds unnecessary cognitive load and context switching. If I were to use a non-POSIX shell, I'd have to remember another, highly domain-specific language, in addition to BASH/ZSH/SH and need to context switch when writing and debugging shell scripts. Instead, I can spend the mental energy on writing code, and learning new languages and tools.
Most remote *nix systems run BASH or another POSIX-compliant shell. This introduces additional context switching when administering or debugging remotely.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And as OP puts it, this "sintax" is a sin.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

If they're taxing it now, that's another reason to to avoid the non-POSIX shell :P