Asklemmy

44708 readers

951 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

-16

What genres of art would be easiest to create with AI? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What art is formulaic? What art is just the old stuff rehashed? What art is shallow or simplistic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

If you're talking about AGI, potentially any form of art would be at its grasp, maybe even some which may not necessarily look like art to us.

If you're talking about the generative models of today, they are incapable of producing art, because they are incapable of emotional intent and expression.

Even Warhol was driven by disdain, and the ironically arty bit was how sort of stripped of art his art was as a result of his disdain.