this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2023

-1 points (0.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13505 readers

1330 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

-1

Juche linguists: Chomsky? You mean the non-dialectical idealist reactionary bourgeois rationalist essentialist?? (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by weeping_angel@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Critique of Chomsky's Language Acquisition Theory by Kim Chol Ho, from "Korean Language & Literature" DPRK 2016

:juche-boi: :chomsky-yes-honey:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Antoine_St_Hexubeary@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Meh. The universal grammar concept has the potential to yield interesting insights, even if Chomsky's version of it (or at least, Chomsky's version of it which was current when I was in undergrad) resembles English too much in the particulars. Also, the "linguistic differences between ethnic groups" can of worms rarely contains anything useful, at least not when Westerners open it.

I will reserve judgment until I read more. Got any more?