this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
693 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19594 readers
4970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senator Bernie Sanders condemned Trump’s order to freeze all federal loans and grants, calling it a “dangerous move towards authoritarianism” and “blatantly unconstitutional.”

The directive, exempting Social Security and Medicare, is expected to impact universities, nonprofits, food assistance programs, health centers, and disabled veterans.

Sanders emphasized that Congress holds the “power of the purse” and urged Americans to oppose the order.

Attorneys general are preparing legal challenges to overturn the freeze.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Republicans, everyone who voted for him and everyone who decided to not vote or to vote for third parties all decided that he should be king.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. There are also Dems in Congress/Senate that have been voting yea to his bills. It's disgusting.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Yeah, every single Republican hates us and are openly corrupt, but like 2 Dems (usually caucusing Independents) are also bad."

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 13 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Im confused, are we supposed to pretend that there aren’t also democrats that are voting for Trump initiatives? Because trying to remove accountability for that seems idiotic.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Drawing attention to the outliers that vote against party lines is something that is often done by concern trolls to argue both sides are the same and sow apathy for democrats. This is most noticeable around election time.

You may not be trying to do that but your comment resembles what they would say. Usually blaming all democrats for the actions of a few going against the party.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Democrats (there's five or six of them) that are voting for Trumps insane bills need to be named and shamed. It doesn't have have anything to do with "both sides".

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So name those Democrats instead of painting the whole party with the same brush as the Republicans

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I never said all of them. You're way over reacting. The ones that are voting for the bills are easily found on the gov site that documents bills.

The comment you replied to literally says five or six of them.

Here's me naming and shaming them:
https://lemm.ee/post/53639210

Notice it's not the entire party like you dumbly assume for some reason.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I can see how your first comment would be construed as if there was a way more significant number of them. While you don't call out a number or say most/all/whatever, its so general that it could be read as implying many of them. A quick edit could clear that up for others.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Im not understanding what you're trying to say. There are five or so Democrats voting for Trumps antics. And yes, all the Republicans vote down the line, that's what they do.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

100% this. He's going to operate as a king, and remove anyone in his way that disagrees. He will take every concession afforded to him by the spineless Republican party and some spineless Dems also.

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Many people that voted for Bernie in 2016 voted for Trump in 2024. Many people eople who voted for Trump in 2024 also voted for AOC down ballot.

The Democratic party has basically made every single mistake they could possibly make in the last 8 years. To lost to fuckin Trump not once but twice is fuckin embarrassing.

Let's see if they learn anything by 2028. I doubt they will but here's to hoping.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm hoping the voters will learn again by 2028 if there are any left.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah the Neolibs would rather burn the country down than lose power.

We need a new leftist party that isn't the Democrats.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The leftists were the ones who back Trump to own the libs.

Hopefully they realize their mistake for the next election.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nice Strawman,

Now let's see Paul Allen's

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

Trump is full of McDonald’s not straw.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that people who didn't vote or voted for other candidates didn't decide he should be king, kind of by definition.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

To quote rush

You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice \ if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah they saw the choices and didn't care to participate in any meaningful way so they can't just wash their hands of the choice they made.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"If you don't want to eat your vegetables, then you can go to bed without dinner. Which do you want, vegetables or bed?"

"I WANT ICE CREAM!"

"That's it! GO TO YOUR ROOM!"

"I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THIS!"

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Little did he know, there was a mini fridge at the room stocked with ice cream

And also an ICE squad, for extra care

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, Harris got more votes than Biden did in the majority of the swing states. It's okay to lay the blame squarely on the people who, you know, actually chose Trump.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s okay to lay the blame squarely on the people who, you know, actually chose Trump.

And I did, along with the other people who are to blame.

load more comments (2 replies)