this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
1260 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6281 readers
1003 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] callyral@pawb.social 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From what I searched, the meteorologist criticized Elon Musk on her private social media, not while working.

If you're flipping burgers, and later you get home and post online on a personal account about your favorite category of adult film, it's none of your employer's business.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I totally agree. Still nothing to do with freedom of speech itself. The 1st amendment.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Freedom of speech and the First Amendment are two different things.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Freedom of speech is just that, free from government interference(look it up). You are referring to censorship.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I meant free speech, not the 1st amendment (I'm not even from the US). The concept of freedom of speech is relevant to this situation.

I believe that a company threatening to fire its employees based on an opinion they had in private or in a personal social media account is wrong. I imagine this isn't necessarily against the law, but should still be acknowledged as a form of censorship.

Of course, there are certain opinions that are absurd or even illegal(?). if a company relies on public image of its employees (not sure if i phrased this correctly) then there are situations where it's reasonable to fire the employee for an opinion, but since it's regarding opinions, this would be very difficult or impossible to define legally while still being fair.

I'm not exactly sure what my point is anymore so I'm just gonna stop arguing, but I'll maybe read some other threads for some insight on the situation

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I do agree though some jobs like a meteorologist means you are on tv and affect the reputation of your business. You can't have actors on your TV show expressing opinions on social media that affect your bottom line. It's bad for business which means you can be fired. All about money sadly. That's censorship though, not freedom of speech unless your country has a different definition of the phrase than the U.S.