this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
91 points (76.9% liked)
Fediverse
29210 readers
1435 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I disagree. Having some kind of grievance with capitalism an sich is central to being leftwing.
If left-wing covers all concepts left of center, and many mild left policy still incorporates capitalism, then it can't be reduced that strictly. I could agree that progressive or far left policy isn't compatible with capitalism
Edit either way, we disagree on semantics. It's off topic for the original question now (I'm not sticking that on you, I contributed to this semantic rabbit hole)
To circle it back, I think there's a way to invite "normies", maintain left leaning (even very left leaning) positions, and not compromise the platform.
Edit edit and I think that's possible without purity testing or shotgunning people with theory