this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
139 points (96.6% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3648 readers
394 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are enough warheads on both sides that no "first strike" could get all or even most. It's lose/lose any time.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Look, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed...

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)
[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just watched the British film 'Threads' about a nuclear exchange. Idk, how much nuclear winter will we need to counteract the global heating over the last 50 years?

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 21 hours ago

Nuclear winter doesnt exist so ww3 is not the solution.