this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
936 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

61024 readers
5730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A pseudonymous coder has created and released an open source “tar pit” to indefinitely trap AI training web crawlers in an infinitely, randomly-generating series of pages to waste their time and computing power. The program, called Nepenthes after the genus of carnivorous pitcher plants which trap and consume their prey, can be deployed by webpage owners to protect their own content from being scraped or can be deployed “offensively” as a honeypot trap to waste AI companies’ resources.

“It's less like flypaper and more an infinite maze holding a minotaur, except the crawler is the minotaur that cannot get out. The typical web crawler doesn't appear to have a lot of logic. It downloads a URL, and if it sees links to other URLs, it downloads those too. Nepenthes generates random links that always point back to itself - the crawler downloads those new links. Nepenthes happily just returns more and more lists of links pointing back to itself,” Aaron B, the creator of Nepenthes, told 404 Media.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 223 points 2 days ago (6 children)

My new favorite is asking if it's cheating to look at your opponent's pieces in chess.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

For anybody who ever had this happen, ChatGPT has some solutions to remedy the situation:

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

When I ask the same in Perplexity, I get this: 1000083824

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’ve always been taught if you say “I adjust” before touching a piece then it’s ok to touch it (specifically so you can move an off-center piece into the center of its square)

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Not gonna fly if you say "I adjust" and then pick up a piece, move it to a new spot, then bring it back down and set it in the original spot.

Also ffs, don't adjust pieces unless it's your turn.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here it's "j'adoube" with heavy German accent

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

...and anywhere else in the world too. :)

[–] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Perplexity is really good, I love using it.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I used to use perplexity until that news came in about it being a front runner to help companies replace workers who went on a strike demanding better work conditions. (Or something along those lines, I only remember the details sparingly)

I have used Duck AI and Brave AI to replace it.

[–] Kyouki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It’s genuinely a great tool. Was really sceptical at first ans about this Ai buzz but this genuinely improved my day to day searches.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There is actually a chaos variant of chess that follows this principle:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriegspiel_(chess)

I read about in a PKD short story.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So battleship but with chess. Sounds frustratingly funny. You'd never know when a piece would get randomly assassinated. Oh you just moved yourself little horsey over and pow he just jumped over 2 pawns and ran over the king! Oops my bad.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

That's wizards chess!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

I tried the same input and got a more expected answer.

Is it cheating if you looked at your opponent's pieces in chess? In chess, it is entirely acceptable and expected to observe your opponent's pieces. In fact, keeping track of your opponent's moves and the position of their pieces is a fundamental part of the game. Chess relies on strategy, planning, and understanding the entire board, including your opponent's pieces and potential moves. This is not considered cheating—it's simply playing the game as intended. Cheating in chess typically involves actions like consulting external help (e.g., a chess engine or another person), distracting your opponent, or intentionally breaking the rules of the game.