this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
468 points (95.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36075 readers
1214 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24607393

credit for this post to :
@denimaww@lemmy.world

The US is actually going to implement a nationwide abortion ban and the measures for how it's going to be handled are already in the works. This bill, which I link to here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/7/text , seems ok at first glance and only seems to want to implement nationwide healthcare centers for women. But when you actually look at what these Pro Women's Healthcare Centers are and mean to offer, it becomes really clear what's going on.

On the first page of the PDF or booklet that appear when you search for the healthcare centers it is clear that they are supported by pro-life organisations and hold extreme pro-life values. And when you read the (very short) booklet it states their values and services that are to be provided. Among them is a requirement for "Abortion Pill Reversal" and encouragement for "Sterilization Reversal". The last page clearly states their values, where among them it states that:

"Abortion is not women's healthcare, because of the damage it causes to women's physical and emotional health and the destruction of unborn life, many of whom are females. Abortion is usually something women turn to when they feel they do not have another choice. This is a tragedy and the opposite of choice and empowerment."

And it goes on to list similiar values. The bill to implement these healthcare centers states that:

"That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses its support for women nationwide to have access to comprehensive, convenient, compassionate, life-affirming, high-quality health care; and

(2) recognizes the high standards established by Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers consortium as standards worth implementing nationwide."

This means that the values that these Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers have are to be set as standards nationwide.

A link to the PDF/booklet about the Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers (PWHC): https://nacn-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/PWHC-Booklet.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 142 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ok states rights crowd, fuck around and find out with my states constitutional protection of abortion.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm really curious how California will handle that one. I would expect Newsom to fall in line as part of the protected class, but he is a politician and cares about reelection.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If trump tries to fuck around with Canada my state will secede more than likely. Canada will retaliate by shutting off our electric which would be a death sentence in the winter.

That and the abortion rights and the fact we were previously an independent republic, it’s looking like we’re going back to being independent.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, why would Canada retaliate against y'all for seceding?

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If trump starts a trade war or physical war or even goes after Greenland I foresee Canada shutting off our electric (hydro Quebec) in retaliation. It would force our secession to save ourselves. Vermont routinely goes well below 0F in the winter for weeks on end, and hydro Quebec is where we get I believe a third of our energy. If not a third a very significant amount that we can’t go without.

I can also see them shutting off oil and gas pipelines to other states but that doesn’t affect vermont. But those states might also secede over it. Fuck with cold states energy infrastructure in winter and we won’t have a choice.

Also our constitution protects abortion, and I can see that also being a factor in us going back to being an independent republic or even joining Canada if they’ll take us. We have a substantial French Canadian population here.

I don’t think it would be like the civil war, most Americans couldn’t point to vermont on a map and were not economically important.

[–] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I know I'm probably getting the political landscape of vermont and new hampshire mixed up, but isn't vermont pretty red? Similar to the way new york is pretty red once you get out of the big city? That's probably going to be a nightmare if anything happened.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It’s pretty complicated. Our “red” looks nothing like the rest of Americas red. We’re not religious, and those who are keep it to themselves and have a live and let live philosophy. Evangelicalism is deeply unpopular here.

We’re a purple state locally, bright blue nationally. We voted like 80+% for Bernie and 70+% for Republican Phil Scott as governor.

I’d say we’re mostly small L libertarians - pro guns, pro LGBTQ, pro women’s rights, pro weed, strong social safety net for a small state. You also have la la land liberals in Burlington and montpelier who are completely out of touch with the rest of the state. I live in a “red” part of the state and have never felt threatened in the decade I’ve been here, most people are chill.

We’re also overwhelmed by rich asshole second+ homeowners from NYC and Boston but luckily they don’t vote in our elections but they greatly influence things despite that. And our legislature is comprised mostly by landlords which… is great for our housing crisis. /s

I grew up in the NYC metro area where I was routinely assaulted for being queer in the 90s. Hence my take no prisoners attitude when it comes to liberals protecting capital and aligning with fascists. Their support for my kind was never genuine and always performative rainbow capitalism.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Secession will certainly mean war under Trump. He's way more of a war hawk than Lincoln ever was.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He wouldn’t be able to find vermont on map. Probably thinks we’re our own country already.

The US hasn’t won a war since ww2 so again, fuck around find out with the original guerrilla warriors.

We’re not an economic powerhouse, we have limited natural resources, and we have incredibly difficult terrain.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He would probably threaten to carpet bomb the fuck out of you and whine when generals don't do it

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

More than likely!

Hell he’d probably threaten to nuke us, our maple syrup is just that good

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Ah gotcha, that makes sense now.

I lived in Vermont for year, and yeah those winters are no joke. But I could also see y'all telling the fed to go fuck themselves.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

state laws, including their constitutions, mean zip when federal law or the nation's constitution conflicts and takes precedence.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really true. States can't infringe on rights granted by the constitution but they can add rights. See: infingement of 2A rights by states and legalized cannabis at the state level, respectively. Look at federal drinking age laws. States had lower ages until the feds pressured States by witholding interstate road funding...

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

I thought that if something is federally illegal you can still be arrested for it by the federal government. Like a DEA agent could arrest people in CO for having weed-- it just means that state law enforcement won't arrest you.

So theoretically they could outlaw abortion and create a federal bureau of agents to enforce it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

In this case there’s a Supreme Court decision that this issue should be left up to the states. Sure key they won’t reverse themselves so soon, right?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Right we were just hoping for the two braincells to fire and them realizing that it was never about states rights

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Cognitive dissonance doesn't work on those people

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 day ago

It's about states rights to control other states.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Guess we’re seceding.