this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
519 points (96.9% liked)

memes

11208 readers
2156 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (6 children)

They will lose more customers than just furries.

Although honestly it would be funny if everyone went out and bout animal costumes and just piled into the place. Just order a drink and fill every seat and doorway in there.

It would piss them off and be hilarious all at once.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You guys are talking like this isn’t fake. This is a joke. There’s a bunch of these, it started with “Blockbuster Nigeria” on Facebook, or at least that’s the first type of account like this I saw. This is not run by a Burger King in Moldova, 90% it’s a 14 year old shitposter in the US.

I put on my hazmat suit to bring you this:

[–] GreyLotus@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's something about lemmy that strongly attracts people that would take a moldovan fast food parody account so seriously.

I believe everything I hear on the Internet about Moldova, it's a fact.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My sensors must be faulty. I didn't detect this troll at all. Good spot.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 3 days ago

What tripped up my sensors is that it simply doesn't read like a Moldovan

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They will lose more customers than just furries.

No they absolutely won't. If anything this is good PR for them.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I suppose it could be a net gain, but they most certainly will lose furries and people who support others' rights to be themselves as customers.

But yes, overall, they may gain customers. Although i can't think of a time that i have gone somewhere to eat/shop or use a service more because they discriminate against something i dont personally like.

I can think of a number of situations where i have stopped using a service because they discriminate against something i support.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

they most certainly will lose furries

That's the objective

people who support others’ rights to be themselves as customers

The number of people who would boycott a restaurant over furries being banned is going to round down to zero.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The number of people who would boycott a restaurant over furries being banned is going to round down to zero.

As would my patience for arguing about stuff we can't usefully quantify.

Im not going to engage in that discussion.

Anyway as someone else pointed out, this is likely completely fake.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You started the discussion though lol

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I made a statement that they would lose more than just furries as customers. Which frankly is distinctly possible, if not probable. You made a separate claim that the number of people that would care about furries getting banned from a burger king would be very few. Which is not something you can prove, back up with any evidence or quantify is any real way. I refused to continue a discussion about how many people care about furries as it isn't really saying anything about my original statement, which, again, was only that people would care.

Also i get the impression you have a problem with furries. Based on the language you used. I may be wrong, but it doesnt seem likely.

If you can remove your own personal bias from the conversation and talk less about your opinion that no one cares about furries and more about the fact that banning anyone from any service based on them being themselves is a foul act and one that in most circumstances would piss off more than just those in that subculture then we can talk.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ok. Well, like i said. Not engaging. You are disingenuous, purposefully confrontational. A troll of the highest order. Bye.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is about a joke account making a joke about banning furries lol

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I literally told you that a few posts back. What are you on about?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm just saying you're acting way too seriously about this shit

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, i normally get that response when people realise they were mistaken and dont want to admit it.

I told you that it was identified as a troll. You were just as invested as me. You were trying to be condescending. You were ignorant and talking shit about a group of people that it's easy to shit on.

All i did was point out that shiting on minorities is bad, and you started shitting on furries.

Honestly, you can try as much as you like to tell me I'm being too serious, but you were an asshole and you know it.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, from your mum. All the time.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you're getting that reply all the time then it might be that you're in the habit of taking things too seriously...

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey mate, its fine that you made a mistake. Dont worry. You dont need to admit it. I see you trying to brush past it by saying im too serious. You made an argument that missed the point of my comment. I know it embarrassing. And now you are trying to make out like im taking things too seriously to distract from your own failure.

Dont worry about it. Everyone sees you being a moron.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And now you are trying to make out like im taking things too seriously

You sure aren't helping your case with this reply...

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's ok, mate. Take the L. It's ok. We all make mistakes. I made one by engaging with you after assuring you i would not.

You can just accept when you fuck up. It's more embarrassing for you to think this is still a real conversation, and I'm not just moking you now.

Better luck next time. Jabroni

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's more embarrassing for you to think this is still a real conversation, and I'm not just moking you now.

Oh really?

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seriously, it's fine. I've accepted it. You should, too.

You made a mistake, and it's fine.

Walk away, my dude...

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I genuinely forgot what this is about

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I think it's been pretty fun or rather intetesting

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They won't, you really, really, over-estimate how much people would care about weird fetishist people of which there are dozens, and how little of impact posts on the social media have on general public. And bad publicity doesn't exist, so at worst they attract more customers due to being popular meme place where people are banned for ridiculous reasons.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Furry != people in animal suits in public.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 days ago

they are called "mascots" in polite company

[–] fluxx1@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You really don't know Moldova, or easter Europe then. Most people don't even know about furries and their first reaction is not going to be positive. People are cautious about new and strange things and ultimately get scared of them. They look at this as preserving what is normal to them. I'm sorry, most of the world is conservative, not progressive.

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No one cares? Unless you behave extremely weird at worst people assume that you are advertising something or that's some kind of attraction with costumed people for kids. Do people really go around in costumes every day and not on conventions and festivals?

[–] fluxx1@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Yes no one cares, but then a big company announces they will not serve people in animal costumes. Then people go - makes sense, it's weird anyway. I've never seen a person in animal costume in person, not even as a mascot or on a kid's birthday. It's just not a thing here. And I'm from Serbia, it's provably even rarer in Moldova. I would find it weird if someone explicitly said they will deny them service. It's like denying service to dinosaurs, it's odd. It is a good cheap marketing though.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

That would just help them with this what I assume is a marketing campaign? No furman har har eat McNugget.