this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
393 points (98.0% liked)

politics

20394 readers
3395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No further info in the article as it's breaking news. NBC broke into the inauguration to announce it.

Biden pardoned his entire family and their spouses as Trump directly threatened all of them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, they gave voters plenty to be hopeful about but none of them actually want that future. The choice was pretty damn clear.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What would the second Biden/Harris admin have done that the first wouldn't have? Actual functioning healthcare? They didn't even say they were aiming for that.

Look, I'm not saying the Dems weren't the less bad choice, I'm not even saying that voters should have been more active, but what happened was that Dems weren't able to turn out the vote because they alienated some of their electorate. Trump mostly didn't gain or lose voters.

And it's quite a shit take to have it out for "Gaza single issue voters", when you ask them to be "no fascism single issue voters". Some people have different sets of values, almost nobody wants to live in a dictatorship, but aside from a few outliers like Lina Khan, the Dems just didn't work for the people.

And stepping back, it was not even the current Dems' fault mainly. It's the entire political establishment of the past decades letting the system slide into this, inch by inch. It's every time some rich guy didn't get arrested for his shenanigans, every little slip where money trumped morals and laws. This is the result.

Imagine, just imagine, if the ICE threw the illegal immigrant Musk out like they do with brown people. Or if the IRS wasn't underfunded for decades. And I know that it's mostly the ghoulish machinations of the GOP that's to blame for that, but I never saw a Dem presidential candidate campaign on "law and order for the wealthy as well" or "make megacorps pay their due taxes", or even "let's catch up to the rest of the world with healthcare".

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

What would the second Biden/Harris admin have done that the first wouldn’t have?

First of all they got a lot done in the first 4 years. So much so that I cant fit it all in a single comment. You should read about it here https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-record

As for what they would get done, it would be continuing progressing the work from the previous term which only seems like nothing because you don't know.

Some highlights included making child tax credit permanent(now gone under trump). Implementing a tax rate for people making over 400k and a minimum tax for extremely high earners. Rasing corporate tax rate and closing tax loopholes. Capping the price on more commonly used drugs(trump has already removed the cap on insulin that was implemented last term). Loan cancellations for 5million more Americans. Expanding apprenticeships and job training for teachers, nurses, and other civil servants. Expand Medicare providing child care to millions of families for less than $10 a day. Lowering housing costs by building/renovating 2million homes. Universal background checks for guns, safe storage requirements.

Judging by how much he was able to get done during his first term its likely he would have gotten more than half of the above bills passed.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Not having a felon who attempted coup enter into office that has recently proved that dictatorships and tyranny are legal in US alienated the voters"

Americans deserve every single thing coming to them and they deserve to prove yet again they are some of the most uneducated, unintelligent and self absorbed people around.

If you are either one of the Americans this doesn't apply to, you have already taken it as a champ since you understand collective punishment means everyone needs to take it.