this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
659 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19378 readers
3181 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Vincent Oriedo, a biotechnology scientist, had just such a question. What lessons have been learned, he asked, from Harris’s defeat in this vital swing county in a crucial battleground state that voted for Joe Biden four years ago, and how are the Democrats applying them?

“They did not answer the question,” he said.

“It tells me that they haven’t learned the lessons and they have their inner state of denial. I’ve been paying careful attention to the influencers within the Democratic party. Their discussions have centred around, ‘If only we messaged better, if only we had a better candidate, if only we did all these superficial things.’ There is really a lack of understanding that they are losing their base, losing constituencies they are taking for granted.”

“We have set ourselves up for generational loss because we keep promoting from within leaders that that do not criticise the moneyed interests. They refuse to take a hard look at what Americans actually believe and meet those needs.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

In a capitalist society, the role of government should be to protect citizens from corporations.

If nobody is willing to do that, what use are they?

Three things are needed for this to work: labor, capital, and ~~government~~ authorized violence.

The first got destroyed, and the second used the third to get bigger than ever.

So we went from a tricycle to a penny farthing and now we’re falling over.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not how capitalism works... capitalists uses the state to secure, and concentrate power in their hands....

[–] pyrflie@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

We also have no responsibility to protect them. That fall on their shareholders and we want to hang ALL of them.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The government is a tool of the capitalist class in a capitalist society. Democracy was originally for the capitalists and their allies and now is a hedge against revolution.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Democracy means "rule by the people as equals".

It doesn't mean " western power".

To be against democracy as an ideology or concept is to be against having humans rights: to be able to decide how you will live and die and for what purpose the fruits of your labor is used.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So do we live in a democracy, banjo? Is there any correlation at all between what government does and what the people want?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The current leaders recieved the majority of votes. The candidates all also won their respective primaries.

The problem lies with the voters (and campaign finance, but thats a partisan issue as well, meaning voters also chose that problem).

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The USSR had votes. So does Russia and North Korea. Have votes does not equal having democracy.

Democracy: control of an organization or group by the majority of its members.

Theres very close to zero correlation between what laws pass in the US government and what citizens want to pass. So-- its not a democracy at all is it.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The USA is generally classified as a flawed democracy, but you cannot even compare it to how Putin, Xi Jinping, or the Un dynasty stay in power.

Also we've strayed really far off topic from talking about Democracy as a concept.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know how anything you wrote is relevant to what I wrote.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said:

Democracy was originally for the capitalists and their allies and now is a hedge against revolution.

Democracy isn't a compromise with the rich. It is complete ownership by the people.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democracy in its idealized form, of which I am a proponent of, is that, assuming you mean ownership of the means of production. In popular use, what many countries have is considered a democracy. To be pedantic, we elect representatives to the government by democratic means in most capitalist countries. We call this democracy. I think we should have the former, but I'm not interested in wasting my little social good will on pedantry and definitions with the average person.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

That's fair, it was pedantry.