this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
1558 points (99.2% liked)

Fediverse

29003 readers
2596 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

his post on mastodon is here:

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/113849098386232034

Dear Mark, I hope this finds you well. I noticed something interesting today - it seems Instagram is blocking links to my little open-source project. You know, the one that lets people share photos without harvesting their personal data or forcing algorithmic feeds on them. I have to admit, I'm flattered. Who would've thought a small team of volunteers could build something that would catch your attention? We're just trying to give people a choice in how they share their memories online. No VCs, no surveillance capitalism, just code and community. Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people, not maximizing engagement metrics. Our project might be tiny compared to Instagram, but we're staying true to that original spirit of social media - giving people control over their online presence without turning them into products. You could've ignored us. Instead, by blocking our links, you've given us the best endorsement we could ask for. You've confirmed what we've been saying all along - that big tech is more interested in protecting their walled gardens than fostering genuine innovation. Every time you block a link to our platform, you remind people why we built it in the first place. Your action tells them there are alternatives worth exploring, ones that respect their privacy and agency. So thank you, Mark. You've turned our little project into a symbol of resistance against digital monopolies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 310 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people

I remember that it was about abusing the private information of all the "dumb fucks" who created an account.

The letter is good though, but zucky will still be a billionaire whether he will read it or not.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah also facebook started as an evolution of men rating women on his campus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Facebook#Facemash It should be no surprise that zuck has recently started proclaiming that he wants a more masculine corporate identity, it's been that way from the beginning

"The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive." - Zuck, 2003

[–] oce@jlai.lu 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wasn't it about ranking female students by attractiveness or something?

Is hotornot.com still live?

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s just it. Zuck could sell off and close shop and live large for the rest of his life. And yet he chooses to fuck around with people instead.

It’s weird.

There’s creating. And then there’s harvesting content and creations of others. The former is the only one that makes you interesting.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

When you think about it, too, you realize these people have nothing good inside them. They seek power because externally people covet power. Normal people covet power because they want control of their own lives but mark has control and doesn't fucking get it. He thinks power is inherently good so he steals it all away for himself but no matter how hard he trys he can't look inward and find anything that means something more than that. It's truly sad and grotesque. My mind could be set on 100 different paths that would fill me with so much satisfaction that nothing else would matter and mark can't find one for himself.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was first provided to college/edu addresses. It wasn't what it is today at all.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 83 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As evil as it's sounds, he's not wrong.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I deleted my account when that came out, so I've been Facebook free since something like 2006.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't even join until then. I thought that info came out way later?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Maybe it was 2008 instead of 06? Seemed like it came out very early, I'd only had an account for a year or so I think, shortly after it was opened up outside EDU domains.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Facebook was about, "connecting people" though. It was the first stage in its growth. It was also before monetization and was actively losing money.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

it was always all about the data, even back in the hot-or-not clone days.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

It was about growing the user base so more data could be harvested, not about the connections being made.