this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
1005 points (95.7% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

575 readers
687 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why in god's name would you think ability to exert control over a company wouldn't matter to the US government..?

[–] CharmOffensive@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Because they never exercise it in respect to social media?

See how you can't see past this one simple concept and keep circling back?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You don't think it's important for them to have the ability, the assurance of that? I'm not circling back but rather just trying to help you to understand their pov.

What, you think the government thinks "oh we don't care about having more control over social media, we're not going to use that anyway, might as well let China have that control"? I mean come on lol.

[–] CharmOffensive@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You still think this is about exerting a control they have yet to exercise, instead of the far more obvious thing I've repeated about 5 times and you've ignored each time:

THIS IS PROTECTIONISM FOR AMERICAN SOCIAL MEDIA MAGNATES.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I mean I've always held the view that it's both. It was just the control thing that seemed to be a hangup for you.

[–] CharmOffensive@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's both, just that it's really about one of them and the other is just a cherry on top.

Don't try to frame this as a hangup of mine and act like you haven't been thoroughly participating in this debate in a way entirely hyperfixated on "it's about control". You're better than that.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

Don’t try to frame this as a hangup of mine and act like you haven’t been thoroughly participating in this debate in a way entirely hyperfixated on “it’s about control”

I'm not sure how you've been reading this whole thing but it's sorta the part you disagreed with so that's what the discussion became about