this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
266 points (97.8% liked)

News

23799 readers
2700 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Several U.S. states have enacted laws requiring pornography sites, such as PornHub, to implement age verification to prevent minors' access, prompting the site’s parent company, Aylo, to block access in affected states.

Proponents argue these laws protect children, while critics highlight privacy risks, inefficiencies, and potential censorship.

These measures reflect growing social conservatism, with some advocates aiming to restrict adult content broadly.

While privacy-focused age verification methods exist, regulatory clarity is lacking.

Critics warn these laws may suppress responsible platforms, favoring unregulated alternatives, and escalate broader culture wars around sexuality and LGBTQ+ rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeroHelck@lemm.ee 167 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's a classic tactic, use a somewhat legitimate concern (Minors having access to pornography). And blow it far out of proportion, and use it as an excuse to crackdown on what you're really after. You will see people defending these bans because the "reasoning" they're being presented SEEMS rational, but unwittingly they're supporting a mass crackdown on their own rights.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 93 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See also: The constant push by governments to take away our right to private (encrypted) communications.

ItS tO prOteCT the CHILDRen's comMUNIcaTIoN.

yeah no for sure and that's why we should all install spyware onto our phones. there's no "switch in the settings" to turn it off. (for a recent example, see the EU commission's newest proposals.)

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

somewhat legitimate concern (Minors having access to pornography).

Counterpoint: accessing pornography is part of growing up.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There's A LOT of unhealthy porn, especially for kids. Especially for kids with no sex education. It's also easier for them to get addicted.

You could also say alcohol is part of growing up, because for many it is.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

There’s A LOT of unhealthy porn, especially for kids. Especially for kids with no sex education.

Which is why comprehensive sex ed is so important.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the people banning porn are also banning sex Ed, so definitely seems more about control/abuse of power than concern for kids.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

An oppressed and suppressed population is easier to control

[–] spireghost@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Literally 1984

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly learned more (and better) sex ed from porn than school. hentai specifically i could see putting age restrictions on, shit is horrifyingly accessible and has no semblance of consent as a concept.

[–] 3dogsinatrenchcoat@slrpnk.net 8 points 18 hours ago

Hentai is just drawn porn. Not all of it is rape stuff, and there's loads of rape/incest/abuse roleplay in live action porn too.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Like spitting in an open asshole? Lets face it, the industry is pretty fucked up.

Just so I'm clear, porn should be available and these laws are privacy and security nightmares.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 13 hours ago

I learned everything I know about human growth and development from spitting into open assholes.

[–] HeroHelck@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, to an extent sure, I don't think it's some horrible thing for simply moralistic reasons, everyone has to discover their sexuality one way or another. However, I do think maybe having an entire digital library of smut dumped in your lap the moment you have access to a smartphone and some private time is probably not good for your sexual development. Ideally we'd just have parents/guardians use some common sense and take advantage of parental controls to limit access. But, we both know that many are neglectful or simply busy with trying to make ends meet to constantly monitor these things. Is the right answer government intervention? I'm personally more than a little skeptical, but I can see why some people see it as a valid concern.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I am just wondering in which age you grew up. Most millennial (like me) had access to a digital library of smut while growing up, and I certainly made use of it.

But the old ways of stumbling across smut are gone now. No finding someone's porno mag stash, or accessing uncensored porn on the illegal cable box, or reading the smut novels at the grocery store checkout, or the porn VHS section behind the bead curtain at Family Video....

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Won't someone pleeeeeease think of the children!