Privacy

32692 readers

232 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Please suggest privacy friendly ways to Job hunt (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago by koulib@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am looking for new jobs as a Cloud Engineer. Being privacy conscious makes the job hunt relatively hard. I don't use LinkedIn. But most companies publish their openings on websites like this and almost all of them are a privacy nightmare.

As soon as you make an account on them, you are bombarded with thousands of emails and targeted ads. But if I made a temporary email for this purpose, I feel I might get blacklisted.

Honestly I feel kind of sad about today's corporate field.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CCRhode@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

You’re required to provide full personal details to be hired to an employer with dubious security.

I don't know, but I've been told....

You MAY THINK you're submitting an application directly to an employer's Personnel Office on that employer's Web site, but you're actually submitting your application to that employer's contracted head hunter — hence the junk mail because that head hunter has other clients to recruit for. It's the lack of transparency that gripes me.

... so the head hunter has to use restrictive filters on applications they relay to all their clients because they can't rely on the applicant to vet employers they'd be interested in beforehand. These restrictive filters reject applicants for silly reasons like not having experience with every single piece of software on an arbitrary list of brand names.

There is no sunset date to an application made through a third party. The head hunter and his clients will continue to bug you in perpetuity.

They will continue to bug you about nonexistent openings. Just as they can sometimes find positions for people who are not actually looking for employment, they can sometimes place people with employers who have no open positions. It seems worth their while to try. After all, you MAY STILL BE in the market ... sort of.

Employers and their head hunters continue to recruit for positions that have already been filled. This is the old "open requisition" problem. They aim to cover the risk that their new hires won't pan out.

The more positions you apply for, the more head hunter databases you appear in. All their job-application software is incompatible, so you have to reapply and reapply and reapply, but it all seeks the same information: Are you currently employed? If not, they don't know you.