On my Threads profile, I changed my featured link to be my Mastodon profile URL.

Then, on my Mastodon profile, I changed one of the featured links to be my Threads profile URL.

After I saved that change, my Mastodon profile showed a green verification checkmark next to my Threads profile URL. Success!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What’s the problem like? Before I do something stupid…

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ask yourself this: why have you come to the Fediverse in the first place?

[–] BrisaLuna@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some people just went to Fediverse to migrate out of reddit. Might not be aware or still new in the realm of privacy protection.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am one of those people who migrated, and I don't want to be part of any other social media plattform that is run by megacorps. (haven't found a good content rich alternative to youtube though)

[–] BrisaLuna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know how futile this battle is, as it’s undeniable that content are still made on platforms hosted my those megacorps. For now I start with privacy friendly frontends. Libreddit for the reddit stuff and piped for youtube.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

It kinda sucks that those megacorps lured the people/youth in with a prospect of fame and money to produce content for them. Turning what was once a creative pasttime into a tedious job.

[–] Sailor_jets@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Invidious exists. While it is still youtube it at the very least respects your privacy.

[–] pqdinfo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To own my own data and feed and have some control over what's pushed at me?

I mean, I get it. Some people hate X and Meta. I hate them too. But if my aim was to get away from those two, I'd be on Tumblr, not Mastodon. If I was concerned that my postings to "social media" can be abused, I wouldn't use Mastodon either, it's completely open and there's very little concept of privacy.

To put it bluntly, Meta doesn't even need to join the Mastoverse with an ActivityPub instance to vacuum up your Mastoverse data. It just needs single accounts to join the big instances and follow the "Federated feed" on them, doing a little algorithmic work to link accounts to Facebook accounts. It's actually easier for Meta to suck your data from the Mastoverse than it was Twitter or Tumblr. (I deadnamed X, because I assume X's position is so dire that if Meta offered to pay for everyone's feeds, Musk would sell it all. But Twitter, for all of its faults, wouldn't have done that.)

What I'm hoping is that Meta will follow through and join properly, offering ActivityPub feeds and the ability to subscribe to ActivityPub feeds. Doing so will give Meta's own users an off ramp, making it easier for Meta's users to feel able to leave without losing their circle. And it'll give the morons who insist that "OMG MASTODON IS TOO HARD YOU HAVE TO CHOOSE A SERVER!" (I can't be polite about these people any more, the number who brag about their own idiocy is astonishing) a "simple" social network they can join with that off-ramp available for the future.

But no, in my case, I didn't join Mastodon to get away from Meta. I joined so I have the network I want.

[–] foxmoss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

this sums up my viewpoint entirely