this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
63 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40928 readers
688 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Good day! I am trying to find a good alternative as not to use the"smart" functions or using an Xbox to consume our media. I found a few options ie like plasma big screen but it's no longer in development. Essentially I would line love to have it running on an rpi4 and just hooked up to the TV.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The main issue for me is not finding a device to play content, but a dumb screen that is not a potatoe. A 4k HDR OLED Screen without any smart features is basically nowhere to be found

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I won't go back from OLED, but a good source none the less. Thanks

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah there's no going back after OLED.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I also tried finding a dumb 4K TV some time ago and, yeah, they don't exist. 4K TVs were a good tech that came out at the wrong time.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

I guess there's just not big enough of a market there to have a decent selection or reasonable prices.

[–] tritonium@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I mean... just don't connect it.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Then I still have to deal with the screen not respecting my input choice and having to manually switch to my streaming box

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Some devices will prompt you to upgrade the firmware and won't let you do it without internet access, AFTER you're logged in to their platform.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Look into commercial displays. They're dumb TV's.

[–] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You could maybe get an advertisement screen. You know, those you find at train stations and stores.

Maybe, you could even get something like those touch panels McDonald's uses, that would be nice!

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

They have a handful of dumb screens, like you're describing, at Best Buy. Somehow they're thousands of dollars for a normal sized TV.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't most digital signage "SMART" too?

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They usually have a dedicated compute unit which is sold separately (or by a different company)

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nice, I might have to get one. Also, your name reminds me I have to buy more Borax.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago

yes, and next one should be 65"

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A TV that isn’t connected to a network is a dumb screen.

[–] DampCanary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

not entirely,
dumb tv turns on in maybe up to 3s
while "smart" tv still needs more than 30s
so now you have crapiest dumb tv on your hands

[–] Osiris@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My LG C2 which has never been connected to wifi starts up in maybe 3s. Boots right into my Applw TV and I never have to see LGs software

[–] tritonium@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

What kind of shitty TV takes 30s to turn on? Ive never seen one take that long. Smart functions have literally nothing to do with how fast they turn on. In fact a lot of smart TVs, especially with Roku built in, don't even really ever power down completely, and when you press power the screen is on and ready almost instantly.

[–] hardaysknight@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

You answered your own question. As you said, most smart TVs go into a sleep mode, so they appear to turn on in a near instant. But if you ever actually power it down, most take up to a minute to boot up.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Dumb TV's are the same they go to sleep. You need power for the remote to work.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I just got an LG C3 and don't have it connected to the network. I also turned off the fast input and power on and takes maybe 10 seconds to boot into the input. Not much longer than my blu ray player and receiver.