this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
49 points (94.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

1254 readers
106 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
49
Ethics of Luigi (lemmy.today)
submitted 1 week ago by blaggle42@lemmy.today to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm wondering about the Luigi line.

Post Trump, it seems as if there is no justice for the rich besides vigilante justice.

Would any of the below qualify for a Luigi? Where is the line? I find the cognitive ethical dissonance of Luigi disconcerting.

The following list is very dark, and super cynical - I apologize in advance.

A pharma company has found a cure for cancer, but suppresses it to make money on treatment. Causing innumerable deaths.

A pharma company has found a cure for Alzheimer's - but suppresses it. Causing suffering.

A pharma company knows a drug treatment is ineffective for some major illness, but pushes it anyway, suppressing other research. Causing suffering.

A pharma company pushes a drug known to cause massive dependence, with insignificant benefit. Causing suffering.

A car company knows an airbag is defective, and does not fix it. Causing thousands of deaths.

An airplane manufacturer creates an airplane with faulty construction, knowingly, and thousands die.

A manufacturing company pollutes a town's water, causing birth defects, general sickness.

This list could go on forever of course. But where is the line post Luigi, post Trump non-trial. What makes one CEO at risk, and another not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 week ago

All of those people suck and I wouldn't be mad if they were shot dead

It gets trickier when there's multiple viable options. Like "save a child or save two adults" kind of stuff. Most of what people are mad about isn't that. It's just the rich trying to make even more money.