Progressive Politics

1254 readers

73 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

Ethics of Luigi (lemmy.today)

submitted 1 week ago by blaggle42@lemmy.today to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm wondering about the Luigi line.

Post Trump, it seems as if there is no justice for the rich besides vigilante justice.

Would any of the below qualify for a Luigi? Where is the line? I find the cognitive ethical dissonance of Luigi disconcerting.

The following list is very dark, and super cynical - I apologize in advance.

A pharma company has found a cure for cancer, but suppresses it to make money on treatment. Causing innumerable deaths.

A pharma company has found a cure for Alzheimer's - but suppresses it. Causing suffering.

A pharma company knows a drug treatment is ineffective for some major illness, but pushes it anyway, suppressing other research. Causing suffering.

A pharma company pushes a drug known to cause massive dependence, with insignificant benefit. Causing suffering.

A car company knows an airbag is defective, and does not fix it. Causing thousands of deaths.

An airplane manufacturer creates an airplane with faulty construction, knowingly, and thousands die.

A manufacturing company pollutes a town's water, causing birth defects, general sickness.

This list could go on forever of course. But where is the line post Luigi, post Trump non-trial. What makes one CEO at risk, and another not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nothing has changed since pre-Trump in regards to the rich and powerful getting away with killing us through very cool legal means.

All of those examples should have been shot already if they’re not going to be legally dealt with in an appropriate manner.

The end line is when you have a system that stops these scenarios from existing in the first place. Ideally this would be the states role, but it’s corrupted so this leaves it up to individuals to act.