this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
1816 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck AI

1648 readers
236 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 164 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

In other words, an AI-supported radiologist should spend exactly the same amount of time considering your X-ray, and then see if the AI agrees with their judgment, and, if not, they should take a closer look. AI should make radiology more expensive, in order to make it more accurate.

But that’s not the AI business model. AI pitchmen are explicit on this score: The purpose of AI, the source of its value, is its capacity to increase productivity, which is to say, it should allow workers to do more, which will allow their bosses to fire some of them, or get each one to do more work in the same time, or both. The entire investor case for AI is “companies will buy our products so they can do more with less.” It’s not “business custom­ers will buy our products so their products will cost more to make, but will be of higher quality.”

Cory Doctorow: What Kind of Bubble is AI?

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AI tools like this should really be viewed as a calculator. Helpful for speeding up analysis, but you still require an expert to sign off.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly anything they are used for should be validated by someone with a brain.

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

A good brain or just any brain?

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

But that's exactly what's being said. Hire one person to sign off on radiology AI doing the work of ten doctors, badly.

Ideally, yeah - people would review and decide first, then check if the AI opinion confers.

We all know that's just not how things go in a professional setting.

Anyone, including me, is just going to skip to the end and see what the AI says, and consider whether it's reasonable. Then spend the alotted time goofing off.

Obviously this is not how things ought to be, but it's how things have been every time some new tech improves productivity.