this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
482 points (97.6% liked)

memes

10705 readers
2181 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This made me think:

What about thermal runaway protection? I'm betting that might be easily overlooked in a custom "smart device" if, for whatever reason, the temperature sensor were to fail and keep reporting "Hey it's still only (below_target_F_degrees) in here! Keep that heat on full blast!"

This was an issue that made jank 3D printers catch fire and burn houses down until it was mitigated with open source firmware.

Point being, unless there's a "custom smart thermostat project" that's vetted and trusted, stuff like this might be overlooked in someone's Python project, wherein it's bog standard, low level, possibly redundant, in consumer devices. (Especially thanks to safety standards.)

Should there be an open-source smart thermostat project that's looked over by thousands of HVAC turbo-nerds and engineers? Yes. Yes there should! Might already be?