this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
311 points (99.7% liked)

News

23655 readers
3549 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

We’re in the find out phase of ending the Fairness Doctrine

You can thank Ronald Reagan…

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yep, this country wasn't over when Trump got elected either time. He's a symptom of this country's death in its current form under the current constitution.

Reagan was the deathblow, this has just been leftover momentum, that appears to have finally waned. From Trickle down, to legalized bribery, to conversion of their former opposition party into neoliberal corporate bribe takers, to ending real news in favor of corpo serving propaganda like "climate change is a hoax to sell books, CONSUME" on and on.

Trump's authoritarian rise is just akin to vultures helping themselves to the corpse. This country has been little more than an oligarch exploitation piggy bank for half a century.

Yes it would be painful, but we'd need to tear it down and start over, as the core constitutional mechanisms for change have been circumvented through intential propaganda to sow division and protect the sociopathy of our economy from the citizens it hurts and murders for private profit. But we won't out of cowardice, so climate change will do what we're too social opiate addicted and fearful to do in a couple decades when it will hardly matter anymore.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The fairness doctrine didn't do what you think it did.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

I probably should have said "wouldn't" rather than "didn't". It's grossly out-of-date and would be a gross violation of the first amendment if it were to be tried as people want it to be.

It applied only to "holders of broadcasting licenses". That is - "old timey television and radio" that was broadcast over the airwaves. The reasoning being that the airwaves are a limited resource (there can only be so many TV and radio stations in a given area) so the government didn't want a single entity to monopolize all of it with a single voice.

But it wouldn't apply to the internet, cable TV, or any other modern form of communication. It wouldn't do anything to Twitter. It wouldn't even effect Fox News (the cable station) or NewsMax.