this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
202 points (99.0% liked)
Legal News
291 readers
131 users here now
International and local legal news.
Basic rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flag
Some cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules apply
All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Getting 5 years in federal prison over a $543 fine is impressive stupidity.
It's the posting mentality. I bet if you go through this person's social media history, they've said a lot worse with neglible consequences.
But giving someone five years for being a blowhard when people who do real material harm (the average white collar criminal conviction for embezzlement/fraud/inside trading is 2 years) get far less really illustrates who the courts are working for.
He won't serve those 5 years. Its an inital punishment that serves to dissuade others but will be reduced once the media attention blows over.
He might not. He might serve longer. He might die in one of those shitty Texas prisons that get up to 100 degrees with no air conditioning. Who can say?
But I agree this kind of sentencing is primarily a form of state sanctioned shock doctrine. Terrorism on a judicial scale.
I'm kind of happy he was sentenced because I'm sick of people leaving unhinged comments and walking away thinking it's normal.
The US doesn't have a shortage of unhinged people, in large part because the insurance system is such high stakes anxiety inducing industry to work with.
I doubt legalist terrorism stacked on top of bureaucratic negligence will make anyone any saner.