this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
1323 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

4623 readers
1105 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Super oversimplified, but take an imaginary 1GB video file and it will compress roughly to the size below with minimal visual degradation.

H.264 -> H.265 -> AV1

1GB -> 600MB -> 350MB

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks!

Is it (more) cpu expensive to decode the AV1?

[–] CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes. If you don't have hardware that supports AV1 decode, it gets sent to the CPU instead.

For homelab stuff, the responsibility falls on the server to transcode the media to whichever format the client device requests. That usually means being able to have ~2 simultaneous AV1 streams and maxing out the CPU.

With hardware decode, you could have 10+ streams.