this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
72 points (77.3% liked)

196

16732 readers
2159 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
72
bioterroism rule(s) (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by herinaceus@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

~~pharmacists solely being distributors of pre-ordained medication has no detrimental effects on humans. 🫠 the US is great to its people, and has very good healthcare practices!!~~ (livestream is on the 27th and i am excite, but not involved at all)

https://fahrplan.events.ccc.de/congress/2024/fahrplan/talk/ASBXWW/

stream link for those interested:

https://streaming.media.ccc.de/38c3

EDIT: my lack of capitalization and poor word choice has confused people. this event is about making legal, tested for efficacy medication only. pharmacists are good. doctors are good. the cost of medication and other hurdles that prevent people from having access to medication are not.

EDIT 2: i looked into the 4 Theives Vinegar Collective (breifly, just on wikipedia) and i did not realize that they made the EpiPencil, which is an open-source device that injects a mesured dose of epinephrine (a medication that can be bought from a trusted and legal distributor). that's awesome stuff, but it's less awesome that they now want to share chemistry knowlege that they don't necissarily have a full understanding of, and push automated synthesis for people who also don't have the foundational knowledge to ensure safety. not really great. i guess that's what happens when healthcare is entirely for-profit, and inaccessable to so many people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

These guys aren’t about alternative medicine, they’re about DIY manufacturing actual medicine to get around inflated prices.

The OP doesn't get that across at all. Just going by the OP I would expect that they would start trying to sell me bleach to drink.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's a mighty fine line to walk 🧐

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

neither have any meaningful quality control, this would get people killed if it wasn't juicero for chemistry that it is

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but if the alternative is not getting the medicine..

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

Well, there's actually a third point on your scale, which is "The opposite of medicine."

If you take something for pain management and it kills you, is that better than not having the pain meds at all? For some people that's a complicated question; chronic pain can absolutely make someone wish they were dead. So maybe someone is desperate enough to try this in spite of the risks. But they should at least know those risks, right?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

they've made juicero of backyard chemistry. everything you can do with that bullshit jar strapped to arduino you can do with hotplate and standard glassware - and cheaper - and even more because their setup doesn't allow you to run reflux sanely among others. putting procedures as a set of instructions for said arduino is no substitute for actual expertise. iirc their procedure for naloxone can fail in such a way that another pharmaceutical of opposite activity can be made (oxymorphone). there's zero analysis or quality control that would catch this. they're trying to generate synthesis pathways with ai. laufer has no actual training in chemistry, his degree is in maths and i suspect heavy case of engineer syndrome

there's also little consideration, if any, about purification and waste management. do you feel lucky?

[–] herinaceus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

that sounds..... questionable, almost at best. i will still probably tune in, but i'm now prepared to be kind of horrified honestly. i'm not sure someone with a math degree and no chemistry experience is the best source for this kind of information, especially when the substances being produced are meant to be consumed.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

even with a chemistry degree, it’s very common for professionals to overestimate others ability to comprehend their field, and for beginners to overestimate their ability

when it comes to synthesising drugs, that’s a recipe for disaster

[–] herinaceus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

good thing these guys seem in love with automating the process... 🙃

leaving most of the brain-thinkie parts up to an arduino totally solves the "this might kill someone" factor. no-knowledge synthesis is the future! (/s for anyone wanting to toss reagents in a jar, and hope robots are infallable)

really tho, mistakes that make fries taste bad, or twist an ankle don't have shit on barely messing up a step in a synthesis that is to be consumed. it is like their reckless abandon is also intended to be a part of their cause, which makes things more confusing, and raises even more ethical questions.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If that's what they stand for then the imagine is completely mistaken. DIY medicine manufacturing is perfectly legal unless you're selling it or it's a controlled substance.