this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
83 points (66.9% liked)

memes

10693 readers
2259 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 104 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Now try finding someone you find attractive and who also finds you attractive in return (it's impossible).

[–] quafeinum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

AND who is equally kinky

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

That's the boat I'm in, except that I'm also gay and the popular trend is poligamy. :) Fml

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (8 children)

I did a calculation once about my chances of finding a compatible long-term partner, inspired by the Drake Equation and using many many assumptions. The numbers are not good: ~22 out of 8 billion.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Wouldn't be a problem if someone took dating as seriously as Skyscanner takes flight tickets.

[–] Atlas_@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That seems absurdly low. Are you sure that all of your criteria are non-negotiable? And entirely uncorrelated?

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Look I wasn't completely serious about it, there's no way to actually calculate something like that.
For example what's the fraction of people that find me attractive. It could range from 0.05 to 0.5. I have no way of knowing.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

You could work backwards from successful marriage counts.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As a married man, I gotta say you’re probably selling yourself short or have unrealistic expectations of a partner.

Remember that whoever you’re going to date is a person, not a robot. People are not quantifiable. One day they may be a dick, the next they may be pleasant. Some people are willing to compromise and others aren’t. Man, woman, or other, it doesn’t matter. If you’re not willing to compromise something, you’re never going to find someone.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Post pic or be assumed attractive

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

This is weenie shit

[–] WarTowel@lemmy.world 31 points 23 hours ago

So you're saying there's a chance

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yall need to lower your expectations god damn

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I like reminding my single friends that 73% of Americans are considered overweight. 41% are obese.

A shocking amount of my male friends are overweight or obese and refuse to date overweight women.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

We could all lose a few pounds but sharing a meal is a huge thing, take that thicc person out and enjoy meal with another human being you animals. You might even find you have some commonality and you'll feel slightly less isolated when the meal is done.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

I'm curious about the math you did to come to that final number

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

I only need to make 1 assumption to solve that equation for me

0% of people would find me attractive

QE fucking D