this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
178 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
3292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Advance opens door for secure quantum applications without specialized infrastructure

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] knightly@pawb.social 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Nope, quantum entanglement can't enable FTL communication. "Real time" still involves lightspeed lag.

What it does is allows random bits of information to be transmitted in an entangled state. You send an entangled pair of photons, and find out afterwards who got a 1 or a 0 when the photons are observed at either end. They call it 'quantum teleportation' because both ends know what the other got, and the information about who got what can't be intercepted without disrupting the enganglement.

Once they can figure out how to preserve that uncertainty through repeaters, switches, and routers, then we can have a quantum internet that uses encryption based on shared quantum random numbers. It's likely to be necessary soon since quantum computers might only be a few years from breaking current common encryption techniques.

I also want to clarify, we can create asymmetrical encryption algorithms that are quantum resistant but not quantum themselves

Quantum encryption probably won't be in mass use anytime soon, but for extra sensitive applications

[–] shish_mish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Thank you for your explanation.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 0 points 2 days ago

Yup, definitely. Took the words right out of my mouth.