this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
441 points (77.1% liked)

Memes

45901 readers
1390 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
441
Voting for the lesser evil is still evil (feddit.uk)
submitted 1 week ago by robinoberg@feddit.uk to c/memes@lemmy.ml
296 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it suggests that it's sufficient for progressive change.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't think it does.

Don't get me wrong. I know people who want to believe voting is all that is necessary for progressive change, but they are wrong.

Edit: How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it's sufficient for progressive change?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it's sufficient for progressive change?

I said advocatingy for voting...

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok how does advocating for voting for the lesser evil suggest that voting for the lesser evil is sufficient for progressive change? Is that better?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It suggests that people need to vote for progressive change and that congludes their options to enact power on the system.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that makes some sense. But you could just tell people that voting for the lesser evil alone is not enough, you also need to organize. I feel like that is pretty clear. That way you can have your cake and eat it too.